Legal Opinion
State Bank of Hamburg v. Stoeckmann
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 22, 1987No. C8-87-898PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOZNIAK, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal from a mortgage foreclosure action initiated by appellant State Bank of Hamburg (the Bank) against respondents Richard and Margaret Stoeck-mann (Stoeckmanns). The Bank appeals the jury verdict finding it did not possess a valid second mortgage. The Bank claims the trial court’s instructions were erroneous, it erred in admitting hearsay testimony, and the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict. We affirm.
FACTS
Respondent Richard Stoeekmann and his two sisters inherited from their father an 80-acre farm in Carver County, Minnesota. The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Klein v. First Edina National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Richfield Bank & Trust Co. v. SjogrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Cameron v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Midland National Bank of Minneapolis v. PerranoskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Lindstrom v. Yellow Taxi Company of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Alevizos v. METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COM'NCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Dallum v. Farmers Union Central Exchange, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Kesselman v. National Bank of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- Stenvik v. ConstantCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Zorgdrager v. State Wide Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.