Legal Opinion

Kesselman v. National Bank of Arizona

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 22, 1996No. 1 CA-CV 95-0551PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLEINSCHMIDT, Judge.

The plaintiffs, a group of private investors to whom we will refer as “the Lenders,” appeal an order granting summary judgment against them in favor of National Bank of Arizona. The issue is whether a bank has a duty to disclose information about its customer’s account to persons — in this case to the Lenders — with whom the customer does business. We hold that the Bank does not have such a duty, and we affirm the order granting the motion for summary judgment against the investors.

We consider the facts in the light most favorable to the parties opposing summary…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ontiveros v. BorakArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Markowitz v. Arizona Parks BoardArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Richfield Bank & Trust Co. v. SjogrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  4. Coburn v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  5. MacOn County Livestock Market, Inc. v. Kentucky State Bank, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wells Fargo Bank v. Arizona Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Trust FundArizona Supreme Court · 2002
  2. United Jersey Bank v. KenseyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
  3. Dahlgren v. First National Bank of HoldregeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  4. Mukamal v. General Electric Capital Corp. (In re Palm Beach Finance Partners, L.P.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2013
  5. Koss Corp. v. American Express Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API