Legal Opinion

Gresko v. Southland Joint Venture

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided August 8, 1994No. Civ. A. 93-74256PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

GADOLA, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on defendants’ motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiffs have brought this diversity action against defendants alleging negligence in connection with a slip and fall on their premises. In their motion, defendants contend that they had no notice of any dangerous condition, and thus had no duty to make the area safe. For the reasons discussed below, the court will grant defendants’ motion.

I. Background

On…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Ovall Dale Kendall v. The Hoover CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. WiegandMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Gjelaj v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1998
  3. Ahlam Kandil-Elsayed v. F & E Oil IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2023
  4. Ahlam Kandil-Elsayed v. F & E Oil IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2023
  5. Collins v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API