Auerbach's, Inc. v. Kimball
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MAUGHAN, Justice:
On appeal is a summary judgment in favor of Auerbach’s and against Kimball on his counter-claim — the only part of the lawsuit before us. We reverse and remand with instructions to allow Kimball to complete his discovery. Costs to Kimball. All statutory references are to U.C.A.1953.
Kimball alleged the right to a pension of $50 per month for life. This was conditioned, upon his remaining in the employ of Auerbach’s for 20 years; and until his 65th birthday. This claim is grounded upon an asserted oral promise of Auerbach’s personnel manager; .made at the inception of Kimball’s…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Driggs v. Utah Teachers Retirement BoardUtah Supreme Court · 1943
- Schofield v. Zion's Co-Op. Mercantile InstitutionUtah Supreme Court · 1934
- Strand v. Associated Students of the University of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1977
- Amicone v. Kennecott Copper CorporationUtah Supreme Court · 1967
3Cited by4 opinions
- Callioux v. Progressive Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1987
- Downtown Athletic Club v. HormanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987
- Cox v. WintersUtah Supreme Court · 1984
- Drysdale v. Ford Motor Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1997