Legal Opinion

Amicone v. Kennecott Copper Corporation

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1967No. 10736PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALLISTER, Justice:

Plaintiff brought this action to establish his claim to certain benefits provided in defendant’s, Kennecott Copper Corporation retirement plan for salaried employees. The case was tried to a jury and submitted on instructions and special interrogatories. The trial court determined that the answers favored defendant and entered judgment in its favor and plaintiff appeals.

The claim of plaintiff is premised on the provisions in the plan granting benefits to employees who are permanently and totally disabled. The plan is “noncontributory”— initiated and sustained by the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Driggs v. Utah Teachers Retirement BoardUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Schofield v. Zion's Co-Op. Mercantile InstitutionUtah Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Menke v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
  4. Siegel v. First Pennsylvania Banking and Trust Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Colovos v. Home Life Ins. Co. of New YorkUtah Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. James Wyper, Jr. v. Providence Washington Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  2. Dangott v. ASG Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  3. Nicely v. Bank of Virginia Trust Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1981
  4. Auerbach's, Inc. v. KimballUtah Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Gronlund v. Church & Dwight Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API