Nahman v. Jacks (In Re Jacks)
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION
BRANDT, Bankruptcy Judge.
In 1997, appellant Jamie Nahman (“Nahman” or “plaintiff’) obtained a state court judgment against Zeus Medical Corporation (“Zeus”) and its alter ego, debtor Brian Paul Jacks (“Jacks” or “defendant”), for $116,882.25 (including interest and costs), on breach of contract and common counts. Jacks filed for chapter 7 1 relief on 2 July 1998. Thereafter, Nahman filed this adversary proceeding to have his state court judgment against Jacks declared nondischargeable for fraud, defalcation while acting in a fiduciary capacity, and for willful and malicious…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Kawaauhau v. GeigerSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Brown v. FelsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Miller v. J.D. Abrams Inc. (In Re Miller)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- In Re Gregory Dewitt Cantrell, DebtorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Oney v. Weinberg (In Re Wienberg)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Thiara v. Spycher Bros. (In Re Thiara)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Berg & Berg Enterprises, LLC v. BoyleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Mervyn's LLC v. Lubert-Adler Group IV, LLC (In Re Mervyn's Holdings, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2010
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.