Legal Opinion

In re Criminal Investigation No. 465

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 27, 1989No. 656PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT M. BELL, Judge.

This appeal from the judgment of the Circuit Court for Baltimore City presents a single question:

Does the Fifth Amendment bar compelled production of documents by a Grand Jury target when production would be testimonial and incriminatory?

This question, in turn, has several aspects: (1) whether, where they have been created prior to incorporation, documents sought by the subpoenas duces tecum which are the subject of this appeal are corporate records; and, (2) if so, whether appellant,1 nevertheless, has a Fifth Amendment *349privilege to refrain from producing them. We…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Bellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Braswell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. United States v. LangCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
  5. In Re Special Investigation No. 281Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jung Chul Park v. Cangen Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  2. Jung Chul Park v. Cangen Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API