Jung Chul Park v. Cangen Corp.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
7 A.3d 520 (2010)
416 Md. 505
JUNG CHUL PARK
v.
CANGEN CORPORATION.
No. 152, Sept. Term, 2008.
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
October 27, 2010.
Carl R. Gold (Law Offices of Carl R. Gold, Townson), on brief, for appellant.
Harry Levy (Schumaker Williams, P.C., Townson), on brief, for appellee.
Argued before BELL, C.J., HARRELL, BATTAGLIA, GREENE, MURPHY, ADKINS and BARBERA, JJ.
BARBERA, J.
This case involves the privilege against compelled self-incrimination, based on the command of the Fifth Amendment that "[n]o person . . . shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.. . ."…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.