Barr v. Birkner
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court of Clay county. Tried below before Hastings, J. The answer was a substantial confession of the averments of the petition and offered no matter of defense.
Read the full summary
Error from the district court of Clay county. Tried below before Hastings, J. The answer was a substantial confession of the averments of the petition and offered no matter of defense. (.Farrar v. 'Triplett, 7 Neb., 240; Dinsmore v. Stimbert, 12 Neb., 434; Douglass v. Matting, 29 la., 498; Kennedy v. McLaughlin, 5 Gray [Mass.], 3; Clark v. Munsell, 6 Met. [Mass.], 373; LLaskins v. Lumsden, 10 Wis., 302; Moberly v. Preston, 8 Mo., 463; Hampton v. Wilson, 4 Dev. [N. Car.], 468; Knight v. Foster, 39 N. H., 576; Wolcott v. Hall, 6 Mass., 514; Alderman v. French, 1 Pick. [Mass.], 1; Wheeler v.…
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
The plaintiff commenced an action of slander against the «defendant in the district court of Clay county, in which she filed the following petition:
“The plaintiff representing unto this honorable court sets forth that she is now, and has been for more than two years last past, a resident of Clay county, Nebraska, and that during her residence in Clay county she has been engaged in the business of keeping a hotel in the city of Sutton in said county.
“2. That the defendant is a physician and surgeon duly «qualified under and by virtue of the laws of the state of Nebraska to practice medicine.
“3.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Boldt v. BudwigNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
- Berry v. DrydenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1842
- Mansfield v. MansfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1858
- Sanford v. GaddisIllinois Supreme Court · 1853
- Sabin v. AngellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1874
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Herzog v. CampbellNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Estelle v. Daily News Publishing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1916