Legal Opinion

Lyman v. Remington Rand, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 30, 1951No. 162, Docket 21843PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

A special master appeals from the award made to him for his services in the action in which he was appointed to ascertain the reasonable value of the defendant’s use of a patent. On July 18, 1941, the district court entered an interlocutory judgment, finding the defendant so liable and on October 2, 1941, it appointed the appellant special master to determine the amount of the liability. The master filed his report on December 21, 1949, recommending a judgment of $940,380.36, and at the same time filed his application for the taxation and settlement of his fee: no judgment has as yet been…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Newton v. Consolidated Gas Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Walling v. Norfolk Southern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
  3. Williams v. Sawyer Bros.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  4. Central Trust Co. v. United States Light & Heating Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
  5. Tuttle v. ClaflinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Republic of China v. American Express Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  2. Redding & Company, Inc. v. Russwine Construction CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  3. Rieser v. Baltimore Ohio Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  4. Pabellon v. Grace Line, Inc. (Coston Supply Co., Third-And-Fourth-Party Defendants)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  5. Kemart Corporation, a Corporation v. Printing Arts Research Laboratories, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API