Legal Opinion

United States v. Michael O. Heilmann,appellee

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 3, 2001No. 00-1669PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.

The government appeals the district court’s departure below the applicable guidelines range. We vacate the sentence and remand the case for further proceedings.

Pursuant to a written plea agreement in which the government agreed to dismiss an indictment charging him with possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, see 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), Michael Heilmann pleaded guilty to a charge of traveling interstate to promote and facilitate the commission of felony drug offenses, see 18 U.S.C. § 1952(a)(3). At sentencing, the court set the base offense…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Justin WebbCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
  2. United States v. Brent William AlleryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Matthew M. StoneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  2. United States of America, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Casey Marie Yirkovsky, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  3. United States of America, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Casey Marie Yirkovsky, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  4. United States v. Casey M. YirkovskyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  5. United States v. Hernandez-OrtizCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API