Legal Opinion

United States v. Matthew M. Stone

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 24, 2002No. 01-3516UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Matthew Stone (Stone) pled guilty to conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841. The presentence report (PSR) assigned Stone four criminal history points under U.S.S.G. § 4A1.1 resulting in a criminal history category of III, but the district court departed downward under U.S.S.G. § 4A1.3 to a criminal history category of I, finding category III overstated the seriousness of Stone’s past criminal conduct. Although Stone’s sentencing range was then 87-108 months, the amount of drugs involved triggered a statutory mandatory minimum sentence of ten years…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Justin WebbCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
  2. United States v. Shellie Lee LangmadeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  3. United States v. Michael O. Heilmann,appelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Matthew M. StoneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  2. United States of America, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Casey Marie Yirkovsky, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  3. United States of America, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Casey Marie Yirkovsky, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  4. United States v. Casey M. YirkovskyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API