Legal Opinion

Durkin v. Waldron

District Court, W.D. Louisiana

Decided March 31, 1955No. Civ. A. No. 3759PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNTER, District Judge.

The proceeding here is brought by the Secretary of Labor in his official capacity under Section 16(e) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq. to recover wages due three named employees (J. C. Porter, E. H. Kinney, and C. W. Gorman), in accordance with their written requests.

The facts may be summarized as follows:

Defendant Waldron, during the period material hereto (June 3, 1950 to March 3, 1951) was engaged in the production of oil from wells owned and operated by him in the so-called Tullos Oil Field. The corporate defendant was engaged in…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. D. A. Schulte, Inc. v. GangiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Warren-Bradshaw Drilling Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. George P. Shultz, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. E. E. Falk, Individually and as a Partner in Drucker and FalkCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
  2. Mitchell v. Cowley & Bro.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  3. J. Robert Sealy v. James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  4. Mitchell v. Sin Jin Products Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1959
  5. Mitchell v. John R. Cowley & Bro.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API