Former Employees of Alcatel Telecommunications Cable v. Herman
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
I. Introduction
Barzilay, Judge:
Before the court is Pls. ’ Mot. for J. on the Agency R. (“Pl.’s Mot”) contesting the Secretary of the United States Department of Labor’s (“Labor” or “Department”) denial of Plaintiff s petition for trade adjustment assistance (“TAA”) under section 221(a) of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended by the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988 (EL. 100-418). Plaintiffs claim: (1) Labor’s denial of the TAA petition was unsupported by substantial evidence; (2) Labor’s in vestigation violated Plaintiffs’ due process rights; and (3) Plaintiffs are entitled to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Ceramica Regiomontana, S.A. And Industrias Intercontinental, S.A. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Ceramica Regiomontanam, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Uaw v. F. Ray MarshallCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- Woodrum v. DonovanUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.