Legal Opinion

Former Employees of Alcatel Telecommunications Cable v. Herman

United States Court of International Trade

Decided July 27, 2000No. Court 98-03-00540Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

I. Introduction

Barzilay, Judge:

Before the court is Pls. ’ Mot. for J. on the Agency R. (“Pl.’s Mot”) contesting the Secretary of the United States Department of Labor’s (“Labor” or “Department”) denial of Plaintiff s petition for trade adjustment assistance (“TAA”) under section 221(a) of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended by the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988 (EL. 100-418). Plaintiffs claim: (1) Labor’s denial of the TAA petition was unsupported by substantial evidence; (2) Labor’s in vestigation violated Plaintiffs’ due process rights; and (3) Plaintiffs are entitled to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Ceramica Regiomontana, S.A. And Industrias Intercontinental, S.A. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  3. Ceramica Regiomontanam, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
  4. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Uaw v. F. Ray MarshallCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
  5. Woodrum v. DonovanUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API