Legal Opinion

Behrends v. Beyschlag

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1897No. 6917PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from the district court of Nemaha county. Tried below before Babcock, J.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

The defendant in error commenced this action in the district court of Nemaha, county to recover of plaintiff in error the amount which he claimed had become his due as damages by reason of an alleged breach of a contract of sale of some corn, by the failure, on the part of plaintiff in error, to deliver the corn. The contract of •sale, as pleaded, was as follows:

*306“Nemaha City, Neb., March 23, 1891.
“This is to certify that I have this day sold to F. Beyschlag, to be delivered at Johnson, Nebraska, three or four thousand bushels of g*ood merchantable white corn, at fifty-two cents per bushel, to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Romberg v. FokkenNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Walter A. Wood Mowing & Reaping Machine Co. v. GerholdNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Walter Bros. v. Reed & GerardNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Mount v. . LyonNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  5. Romberg v. HedigerNebraska Supreme Court · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wolfe v. A. E. Kusterer & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Edwards v. Hastings Distributing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API