Legal Opinion

Uhl v. Komatsu Forklift Co., Ltd.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided December 8, 2006No. 04-10148PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO VACATE ARBITRATION AWARD, GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD, AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR WRIT OF GARNISHMENT

LAWSON, District Judge.

The plaintiff, Donna Uhl, filed this action to recover damages resulting from the death of her husband, decedent Lynn Uhl. The plaintiff alleges that Lynn Uhl’s death was caused by a defective product manufactured by the defendants. After one false start, the parties filed a stipulation to submit the case to binding arbitration. The Court therefore dismissed the case with the proviso…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Andros Compania Maritima, S.A., as Disponent Owners of the Kissavos, and Marc Rich & Co., A.G., as CharterersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  4. Daniel v. Green v. Ameritech Corporation and Ameritech Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  5. O.R. Securities, Inc. v. Professional Planning Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. James Freeman v. Pittsburgh Glass Works LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  2. Midwest Generation EME, LLC v. Continuum Chemical Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
  3. Questar Capital Corp. v. GorterDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2012
  4. Affordable Care, LLC v. McIntyreDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API