Legal Opinion
Great Falls Manuf'g Co. v. Garland
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maryland
Decided July 28, 1885PublishedCited by 7 opinions
In Equity.
1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.
This motion for preliminary injunction is made upon a bill filed by the Great Falls Manufacturing Company, a corporation of the state of Virginia, against Augustus H. Garland, a citizen of Arkansas, now attorney general of the United States; Williarh 0. Endicott, a citizen of Massachusetts, now secretary of war of th'e United States; Garrett -J. Lydeeker, a citizen of New York, now mq,.- *522¡¡or of engineers in the United States army; George B. Chittenden and Samuel H. Chittenden, citizens of the United States, now dwelling in the state of Maryland, contractors with said secretary of war for the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Haverhill Bridge Proprietors v. County Commissioners of EssexMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
- Martin v. TylerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
- United States v. Kennesaw Mountain Battlefield Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
- United States v. GrahamDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1917
- United States v. O'NeillDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.