United States v. Kennesaw Mountain Battlefield Ass'n
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.
Appeal and cross appeal in a condemnation suit, entered on a verdict increased from $9,000 to $16,000 by an additur, required by the District Judge and consented to by the United States.
Appellant insists that the District Judge was, under the circumstances existent here, without authority to require an additur, and that, despite its consent to the increase, judgment should have been entered for it on the original verdict.
Cross appellants, agreeing with the United States that the requirement of the additur was unauthorized, 1 and was without effect, insist that the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Bauman v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Shoemaker v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Kohl v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Mountain Timber Company v. State of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Paper Converting MacHine Company v. Magna-Graphics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- United States v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
- United States v. 93.970 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958
- Jehl v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
- United States v. Certain Parcels of Land in Rapides ParishCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1945
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.