Legal Opinion

Tinner v. District of Columbia Department of Consumer & Regulatory Affairs

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 11, 1997No. 96-AA-1017PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELSON, Senior Judge:

Petitioner, Reginald Tinner, M.D., seeks review of a 1996 order of the District of Columbia Board of Medicine (“Board”) denying, for the second time, his 1990 application to practice medicine in the District of Columbia. The Board’s denial of Dr. Tinner’s application followed a hearing ordered by this court, which had remanded the Board’s initial denial of Dr. Tinner’s application “for further consideration and explanation of the apparent different treatment of pre-1985 and post-1985 FLEX examinees by requiring a ‘single sitting’ for pre-1985 examinees.”1 Tinner v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Draude v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Superior Beverages, Inc. v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Joseph v. District of Columbia Board of MedicineDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Donahue v. District of Columbia Board of PsychologyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Roberts v. District of Columbia Board of MedicineDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Al-Khattat v. Engineering & Land Surveying Examining Board of the State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  2. Tinner v. District of Columbia Department of Consumer & Regulatory AffairsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API