Legal Opinion

Tinner v. District of Columbia Department of Consumer & Regulatory Affairs

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 11, 1997No. 96-AA-1017Published

1Opinion of the Court

703 A.2d 833 (1997)

Reginald F. TINNER, M.D., Petitioner,

v.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS, Respondent.

No. 96-AA-1017.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Argued October 29, 1997.

Decided December 11, 1997.

Walter G. Birkel, Washington, DC, for Petitioner.

Martin B. White, Assistant Corporation Counsel, with whom Jo Anne Robinson, Interim Corporation Counsel at the time the brief was filed, and Charles L. Reischel, Deputy Corporation Counsel, were on the brief, for Respondent.

Before SCHWELB and KING, Associate Judges, and BELSON, Senior Judge.

BELSON, Senior…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Draude v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Superior Beverages, Inc. v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Joseph v. District of Columbia Board of MedicineDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Donahue v. District of Columbia Board of PsychologyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Roberts v. District of Columbia Board of MedicineDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API