Legal Opinion

Harbison v. McMurray

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1942No. Motion No. 15302. Cause No. 7680PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Critz

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING:

On November 19, 1941, we delivered an opinion and rendered a judgment affirming the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals in this cause. The cause is now before us on motion for rehearing, filed by B. G. Harbison, plaintiff in error. We have reached the conclusion that we were in error in our former judgment and in some of the holdings in our former opinion. We therefore withdraw such opinion and order that it be not published. We substitute therefor the following opinion:

This is a habeas corpus proceeding, begun ex parte in the District Court of Rusk County, Texas,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Tom TongSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. State ex rel. Durner v. HueginWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Cross v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. People Ex Rel. Carr v. MurrayIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Winnovich v. EmeryUtah Supreme Court · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Bernal v. FainterSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. in the Interest of D.W., T.W., and S.G., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2008
  3. Ex Parte RieckCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  4. Hatten v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  5. Gray v. RankinTexas Supreme Court · 1980

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API