Legal Opinion

United States v. Pierotti

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 2, 1946No. 10898PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, Circuit Judge.

In this opinion appellant will be referred to as the Government and appellee as taxpayer.

The question involved is whether the property owned by taxpayer and her husband at the time of his death was held by them in joint tenancy or as so-called new ■style “post-1927” community property under •California law.

In assessing the tax the Government included all the property held by the parties at the time of the husband’s death. Taxpayer contended that only one-half should 'have been included. If the property was owned in joint tenancy the Government was .correct in its position.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Poe v. SeabornSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. United States v. KalesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Tomaier v. TomaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Sears v. RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. King v. PaulyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Carmack v. ScofieldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
  2. Estate of Young v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1998
  3. Sandrini v. AmbrosettiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Rogan v. FerryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
  5. Goldberg v. GoldbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API