Legal Opinion
Weidman v. Weidman
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided January 7, 1931PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
The allegations of the bill in effect are that the plaintiff, now a resident of the State of New York, and the defendant, now a resident of this Commonwealth, were married in Poland, where they lived together as husband and wife, as well as in Austria and Germany; that the defendant subsequently deserted the plaintiff and took up his residence in the State of New York, where he instituted a proceeding in the Supreme Court for the annulment of their marriage; that in 1928 in that court, on motion of the plaintiff (the defendant in that proceeding), order was entered that the defendant (the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Kenney v. Supreme Lodge of the World, Loyal Order of MooseSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Anglo-American Provision Co. v. Davis Provision Co. No. 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Reilly v. Selectmen of BlackstoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- E. S. Parks Shellac Co. v. JonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Rioux v. CroninMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- German v. GermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Cullen v. Building Inspector of North AttleboroughMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
- Surabian v. SurabianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
- Kosior v. Continental Insurance Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Ostrander v. OstranderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.