Legal Opinion

Rosenfeld v. Board of Health of Chilmark

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided July 26, 1989No. 88-P-931PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDreben, J.

The plaintiffs, buyer and seller under a purchase and sale agreement of a parcel of oceanfront land on Martha’s Vineyard, were denied a sewage disposal permit by the board of health of Chilmark (board). More than a year later, the plaintiffs filed a complaint seeking, among other things, declaratory relief and alleging constitutional violations by the board. The board moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the complaint was not timely filed. Their motion was allowed, and the plaintiffs appeal from the ensuing judgment.

The thrust of the board’s argument is that, contrary to the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Snowden v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Nader v. CitronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  4. Creative Environments, Inc. v. Robert EstabrookCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
  5. Alonzo Bonner v. Joseph CoughlinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Mettler Walloon, LLC v. Melrose TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Feeney v. Dell Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  3. Gabbidon v. KingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  4. Kennie v. Natural Resource DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  5. Board of Appeals of Rockport v. DeCarolisMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API