Legal Opinion
In Re Keck, Mahin & Cate
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided June 15, 1999No. 19-05341PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RONALD BARLIANT, Bankruptcy Judge.
Claimant Jerry Krim (“Krim”) filed a class proof of claim on March 4, 1998, seeking $1 billion in ■ damages for legal malpractice and securities fraud. Krim has amended the proof of claim several times, the most recent, filed May 11, 1999, claiming $1 billion in damages for “[sjecu-rities fraud, fraud and breach of fiduciary duty as plead in Civil Action No. H-90-2269 in the U.S. District of Texas, Housten (sic) Division.” 1 Krim seeks to represent a class consisting of persons who purchased equity securities of First City Ban-corporation of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Francine Klingman v. Melvin E. LevinsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re CraftUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2005
- Krim v. Keck, Mahin & Cate (In Re Keck, Mahin & Cate)District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000