Legal Opinion

Krim v. Keck, Mahin & Cate (In Re Keck, Mahin & Cate)

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided September 27, 2000No. 99 C 4496Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ANDERSEN, District Judge.

This is an appeal by the claimant-appellant Jerry Krim (“Krim”) from a final ruling of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, granting the motion of the debtor-appellee Keck, Mahin, & Cate (“Keck”) to dismiss Krim’s proof of claim and denying his petition for class certification. The principal issues are whether the bankruptcy court erred in barring Krim’s motion for class certification under the doctrine of collateral estoppel and whether the bankruptcy court erred in finding that the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. American Tobacco Co., Inc. v. GrinnellTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Francine Klingman v. Melvin E. LevinsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  4. Bankers Trust Company, Cross-Appellee v. Old Republic Insurance Company, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  5. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,975 Michelle K. Tomera, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Arthur T. Galt, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API