Legal Opinion

In Re Herrman

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 27, 1938Published

1Opinion of the Court

This matter is before this court on probate of the will of Elizabeth L. Herrman. Probate is contested by a cousin of decedent who contends that testatrix was mentally incompetent at the time of the will and that its execution was obtained by undue influence.

Testatrix was a spinster of advanced years at the time the will was made. The will was drawn by a person connected with the United States Trust Company, the executor named therein. By specific bequests and by bequests payable out of the residuary clause, the will disposed of the bulk of the estate to various charities. Her cousin, the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clifton v. CliftonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1890
  2. Earle v. Norfolk & New Brunswick Hosiery Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1882
  3. In Re McCombNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1935
  4. Schuchhardt v. SchuchhardtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API