Earle v. Norfolk & New Brunswick Hosiery Co.
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On final hearing on bill and answer and proofs taken before a master.
1Opinion of the Court
Van Fleet, V. C.
The complainants seek to invalidate a deed made by their mother. If they are entitled to succeed in nullifying the deed just mentioned, they will be entitled to a like decree in respect to a. deed made by their mother’s grantee. And also to have a. mortgage made by their father and mother, so far as it may affect their estate, set aside. Tiie grounds alleged against the deed of their mother are want of capacity and undue influence.
The complainants are children of Jonathan Earle and P. Augusta Earle. Their father was treasurer of the Norfolk and New Brunswick Hosiery Company…
2Cited by7 opinions
- In Re RaynoldsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1942
- Blake v. BrennanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1948
- Campana v. AngeliniNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
- McCambridge v. DalyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931
- Wolf v. Palisades Trust Guaranty Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.