Legal Opinion

Bennifield v. Hypres

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1872PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPEAL from the Hendricks Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

•Busicirk, C. J.

This was an action by Sarah F. Bennifield *499and James R. Bennifield, her husband, against Eppa Jane Hypres and Samuel Hypres, her husband, for slanderous words spoken by Eppa Jane Hypres, of and concerning the character of Sarah F. Bennifield for chastity and virtue.

The defendants answered in four paragraphs; first, the general denial; second and third, matters in mitigation of damages; the fourth justified the speaking of the words charged in the complaint. There was a reply in denial of the affirmative paragraphs of the answer.

There was a trial by a jury, and a verdict in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Shoeffler v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1854
  2. Ward v. ColyhanIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Crane v. BuchananIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Albaugh v. JamesIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  5. Newhouse v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1871

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sutherland v. HankinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Garner v. GordonIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Farman v. LaumanIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Sanders v. ReisterSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1875
  5. Rogers v. RogersIndiana Supreme Court · 1874

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API