Legal Opinion

Sheinberg v. Hoffman

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 26, 1916No. 2162PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the¡ District Court of the United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania; W. H. Seward Thomson, Judge. In the matter of the bankruptcy of Abraham Hoffman. Benjamin Sheinberg and Jacob Wéisberg, trading as Sheinberg & Weisberg, creditors, objected to the bankrupt’s petition for a discharge, and from an order of discharge they appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.

The bankrupt petitioned for a discharge. The appellant creditors, having demanded of the bankrupt the payment of their claim in full and being refused, opposed the discharge upon specifications under section 14b (2) (4) of the Bankruptcy Act (30 Stat. at Large, 544), as follows:

That the bankrupt, with intent to conceal his financial condition, (1) failed to keep certain books of account, and (2) destroyed certain records, from which such condition might be ascertained; and (3) concealed a part of his property with intent to hinder, delay and defraud his creditors.

The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ohio Valley Bank Co. v. MackCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1906
  2. Coder v. ArtsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  3. Epstein v. SteinfeldCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1914
  4. Wilson v. Continental Building & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916
  5. In re GarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wald v. LongacreCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1929
  2. Devorkin v. Security Bank & Trust Co. of MemphisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
  3. Lerner v. GladstoneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API