Legal Opinion

Wald v. Longacre

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 16, 1929No. 3903PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from an order denying a discharge to the bankrupt, William E. Wald.

Several specifications of objection to dis- . charge were filed, but the special master to whom they were referred did not sustain any of them, except the second. No appeal was taken from his failure to sustain the other specifications.

We are concerned, therefore, as was the court below, with the second specification only. This specification objected to the discharge :

“For the reason that for the purpose of concealing his assets, he has knowingly and fraudulently made false oaths in his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Epstein v. SteinfeldCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1914
  2. Tennessee Finance Co. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
  3. Schmid v. RosenthalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1916
  4. Davidson v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1923
  5. Sheinberg v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1916

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hudson v. WylieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  2. Moore v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  3. Galion Iron Works & Mfg. Co. v. Beckwith MacHinery Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
  4. Smoley v. New Jersey Zinc Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
  5. Crawford v. BriantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API