Legal Opinion

B.A. Van De Grift, Inc. v. Skagit County

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 5, 1990No. 25531-2-IPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pearson, J. *

B.A. Van de Grift, Inc. (Van de Grift) appeals from a summary judgment in favor of respondent Skagit County (Skagit). Van de Grift contends that material factual issues remain regarding its claims against Skagit following cancellation of a road construction contract. We disagree and affirm the dismissal.

The materials submitted to the trial court, viewed in the light most favorable to Van de Grift, establish the following sequence of events. On August 13, 1985, Skagit entered into a road construction contract with Crown for work on a portion of the Lake Cavanaugh Road. The project…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Seven Gables Corp. v. MGM/UA Entertainment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Murphy v. Campbell Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Vedder v. SpellmanWashington Supreme Court · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Williamson, Inc. v. Calibre Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  2. Williamson, Inc. v. Calibre Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  3. Arctic Stone, Ltd. v. DadvarCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  4. Arctic Stone, Ltd. v. DadvarCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API