Legal Opinion

Cross v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 14, 1915PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Linn Circuit Court. — lion. Fred Lamb, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtTrimble, J.

Respondent was employed in appellant’s roundhouse at Brookfield, Missouri. When not engaged in operating the turntable, bis duty was to wipe engines. In doing tbis a ladder was used on wbicb to ascend and descend from tbe engine; and perhaps tbe employee stood on tbe ladder at times during tbe wiping process.

While thus working on an engine, be received a signal to go at once to tbe turntable. He descended tbe ladder and, in stepping from tbe last rung to tbe ground, bis right foot trod upon a piece of hose three or four inches in diameter lying on tbe ground, whereby bis ankle was turned and…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. HarrimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Smith v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Haskins v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. Smith v. Southern Illinois & Missouri Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  3. Hinson v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  4. Koonse v. Standard Steel Works Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1927
  5. Hinson v. Atlanta & Charlotte Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API