Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hinson v. . R. R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 6, 1916PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1DissentClark, C. J.

From a judgment of nonsuit, plaintiff appealed. The only evidence taken was that offered by plaintiff. Taking that to be true, the court did not err in sustaining motion to nonsuit.

Plaintiff was a hostler in the yards of Southern Railway Company, lessee of defendant, in Charlotte. On the evening of 20 December, 1914, he started home across the yards and switching tracks of defendant. On his way he encountered a train of coal cars connected together, that had been run in one of the side-tracks that day. Plaintiff (647) looked up and down the train of cars and decided to cross the track…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Pedersen v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Aerkfetz v. HumphreysSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Commercial Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
  5. LeRoy Fibre Co. v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul RailwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1914

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ottley v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  2. Southwell v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Sumney v. Southern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
  4. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. TurpinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1924
  5. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co. v. MorganTennessee Supreme Court · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API