Legal Opinion

People v. McCord

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 2, 1936No. Crim. 1891PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Upon a trial by jury, defendant was convicted of a violation of section 72 of the Penal Code. Her motion for a new trial was granted and the People have appealed from the order granting a new trial.

Section 72 of the Penal Code provides, “Every person who, with intent to defraud, presents for allowance or for payment ... to any county . . . officer, authorized to allow or pay the same if genuine, any false or fraudulent claim, bill, account, voucher, or writing, is guilty of a felony”.

Respondent was the director of the social service department of Contra Costa County. We deem it unnecessary to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. BestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  2. Weaver v. Shell Oil Co. of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. People v. RichardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. Nieves v. VigolinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Pope v. WenischCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. HanksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  2. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. People v. PerkinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Addison Miller, Inc. v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  5. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API