Legal Opinion
Ago
Florida Attorney General Reports
Decided January 17, 1974Published
1Opinion of the Court
QUESTION:
May the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services pursuant to s. 657.24, F.S., dispense with charging the department's credit union for services such as the use of a WATS line, the use of a telephone instrument, employees' payroll deductions, and the rental of obsolete office equipment when the cost to the department for such services is not affected by the use thereof made by the credit union?
SUMMARY:
The Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services may dispense with charging a qualified credit union rent for space alloted and services provided, such as the use of a WATS…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- O'NEILL v. BurnsSupreme Court of Florida · 1967
- Bailey v. City of TampaSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
- People v. McCordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Addison Miller, Inc. v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Barnabo v. LewisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.