Legal Opinion

Scheeler v. Sartell Water Controls, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 24, 2007No. A06-715PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge.

An unemployment law judge (ULJ) determined that relator Daniel J. Seheeler was not eligible for unemployment benefits. Relator seeks certiorari review of that determination; relator also moved this court for leave to offer proof of evidence not submitted before the ULJ’s determination. Because we see no error in the ULJ’s determination, we affirm; we deny the motion for leave to offer proof.

FACTS

Relator began work for respondent Sar-tell Water Controls, Inc. a/k/a DeZURIK Water Controls, in February 1979. In the summer of 2005, respondent wanted to reduce its…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  2. Reiter v. KiffmeyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  3. Barna, Guzy & Steffen, Ltd. v. BeensCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  4. Rasidescu v. Commissioner of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Irvine v. St. John's Lutheran Church of MoundCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
  2. Lamah v. Doherty Employment Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
  3. Anthony Browne, Relator v. M. A. Mortenson Company, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API