Barna, Guzy & Steffen, Ltd. v. Beens
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION. SCHUMACHER, Judge.
Appellant Richard A. Beens challenges the district court’s grant of a motion for partial summary judgment in favor of respondent Barna, Guzy & Steffen, Ltd. (the Barna firm), arguing that a shareholder separation agreement violates public policy because it involves fee-splitting among attorneys without client consent and restrains a client’s right to select counsel. We affirm.
FACTS
Beens was a shareholder in the Barna firm until April 1993, when he left to join the law firm of Felhaber, Larson, Fenlon & Vogt (the Felhaber firm). Nine clients whom Beens represented at…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Jacob v. Norris, McLaughlin & MarcusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Independent School District No. 877 v. Loberg Plumbing & Heating Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Dwyer v. JungNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Walker v. GribbleSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
- Alpha Real Estate Co. of Rochester v. Delta Dental Plan of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Groen, Laveson, Goldberg v. KancherNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
- Chappell v. BUTTERFIELD-ODIN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 836District Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
- Scheeler v. Sartell Water Controls, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.