Legal Opinion

Barna, Guzy & Steffen, Ltd. v. Beens

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 26, 1995No. C8-95-1479PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION. SCHUMACHER, Judge.

Appellant Richard A. Beens challenges the district court’s grant of a motion for partial summary judgment in favor of respondent Barna, Guzy & Steffen, Ltd. (the Barna firm), arguing that a shareholder separation agreement violates public policy because it involves fee-splitting among attorneys without client consent and restrains a client’s right to select counsel. We affirm.

FACTS

Beens was a shareholder in the Barna firm until April 1993, when he left to join the law firm of Felhaber, Larson, Fenlon & Vogt (the Felhaber firm). Nine clients whom Beens represented at…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Jacob v. Norris, McLaughlin & MarcusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  4. Independent School District No. 877 v. Loberg Plumbing & Heating Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  5. Dwyer v. JungNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Walker v. GribbleSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  2. Alpha Real Estate Co. of Rochester v. Delta Dental Plan of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  3. Groen, Laveson, Goldberg v. KancherNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
  4. Chappell v. BUTTERFIELD-ODIN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 836District Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
  5. Scheeler v. Sartell Water Controls, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API