Lamah v. Doherty Employment Group, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROSS, Judge.
Daniel Lamah challenges an unemployment law judge’s decision that he is disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits because he quit a full-time, ongoing work assignment he obtained through Doherty Employment Group, Inc., and no statutory exceptions to the disqualification apply. Lamah contends that he worked a series of one-day assignments through the temporary-staffing agency and that the position was part time. Lamah also asserts that his substantial rights were prejudiced because the unemployment law judge did not appoint an interpreter, rejected offered evidence,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Smith v. Employers' Overload Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Skarhus v. Davanni's Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- Ywswf v. Teleplan Wireless Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- Jenkins v. American Express Financial Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Olson v. StarkeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Thao v. Command Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- Deborah Brakefield, Relator v. IND. School District 2889, Department of Employment and Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- Frederick Wright, Relator v. Atterro, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- Michael Robin, Relator v. BHSI LLC, Department of Employment and Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014