Legal Opinion

Ayers v. Board of Adjustment for Robersonville

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 1, 1994No. 932SC123PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

G.S. § 160A-388(e) (Supp. 1992) provides that every decision of a municipal board of adjustment “shall be subject to review by the superior court by proceedings in the nature of certiorari.” In proceedings of this nature, the superior court sits as an appellate court and may review both the sufficiency of the evidence presented to respondent and whether the record reveals an error of law. Concrete Co. v. Board of Commissioner, 299 N.C. 620, 265 S.E.2d 379, reh’g denied, 300 N.C. 562, 270 S.E.2d 106 (1980).

In the present case, the questions before the superior court were (1) what…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Coastal Ready-Mix Concrete Co. v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Capricorn Equity Corp. v. Town of Chapel Hill Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  3. Pritchard v. Elizabeth CityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Pritchard v. Elizabeth CitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  5. Rice Associates of the Southern Highlands, Inc. v. Town of Weaverville Zoning Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Westminster Homes, Inc. v. Town of Cary Zoning Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. Hayes v. FowlerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  3. Kirkpatrick v. Village Council for the Village of PinehurstCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  4. Four Seasons Management Services, Inc. v. Town of Wrightsville BeachCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  5. Myers Park Homeowners Ass'n v. City of CharlotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API