Legal Opinion

Hampton v. Cumberland Cty.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 5, 2017No. COA16-704PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

INMAN, Judge.

*657This appeal concerns the interpretation and application of a county zoning ordinance to firing ranges constructed on property without an approved site plan and permit. We hold that a Farm Identification Number obtained by property owners from the federal government prior to constructing firing ranges does not, as a matter of law, establish that operation of the ranges is a farm use exempt from zoning regulations. We also hold that because the county board of adjustment which first heard the matter failed to resolve material disputed issues of fact, we must vacate the orders below…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Coastal Ready-Mix Concrete Co. v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural Resources v. CarrollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  3. Coble v. CobleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. ACT-UP Triangle v. Commission for Health ServicesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  5. In re the Appeal by McCraryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jeffries v. Cty. of HarnettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  2. Frazier v. Town of Blowing RockCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
  3. Frazier v. Town of Blowing RockCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
  4. Hampton v. Cumberland Cty.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2019
  5. Thompson v. Union Cty.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API