Legal Opinion

State v. Roth

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 13, 1913PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Linn District Court. — Hon. W. N. Treichler, Judge. Suit brought in the name of the State, at the relation of seven qualified ele'etors, for the removal of defendant Roth as Mayor of the City of Cedar Rapids, and Garl, as Marshal, or Chief of Police, of that city. The trial court refused to remove them, and the State appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

No objection is made to the joinder of the two defendants in one action. It appears that in the spring of 1913 there was more or less agitation over the question of Sunday baseball in the city of Cedar Rapids. About March 28, 1913, and, as we understand it, before the league season opened, a petition, signed by about fifty men and women, was presented to the mayor and commissioners of Cedar Rapids. It is as follows, omitting signatures:

To the Hon. Mayor and City Commissioners: We, the undersigned residents, citizens, and property owners of the city of Cedar Rapids, hereby respectfully request…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Evans v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Potter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Felton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. State v. SavreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  5. Parker v. ParkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Fletcher v. NaumannSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  2. State v. ManningSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
  3. State v. BartzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  4. Schnathorst v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
  5. Pennsylvania Co. v. ReesorIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API