Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Fletcher v. Naumann
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided November 19, 1931No. 41230PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDe Graee, J.
The instant action is predicated on Section 1091, Code, 1927. The provisions material to this action read as follows:
“Aiiy * * * elective officer * * * may be removed from office by the district court for any of the following reasons:
“1. For willful or habitual neglect or refusal to perform the duties of his office.
“2. For willful misconduct or maladministration in office.
“3. For corruption. * * *”
Section 1093, Code, 1927, provides: “The petition for removal may be filed: 1. By the attorney-general in all cases. * * *”
The defendant, B. L. Naumann, was a duly elected and qualified member of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Nassoiy v. . TomlinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Getchell & Martin Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. Peterson & SampsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Redmond & Co. v. Atlanta & Birmingham Air-Line RailwaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- State ex rel. Barker v. MeekSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Driscoll v. Burlington-Bristol Bridge Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- City of Jersey City v. HagueSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- Robitzsch v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- State v. ManningSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
- Kellogg v. Iowa State Traveling Men's Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.