Legal Opinion

State v. Savre

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 12, 1905PublishedCited by 35 opinions

Appeal from Mitchell District Court.— Hon. J. F. Clyde, Judge. The defendant was indicted for illegal voting. After all of the evidence had been introduced a 'verdict of not guilty, by the direction of the court, was returned and the defendant discharged. The state appeals.—

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.

The accused is alleged to have voted at the municipal election on March 21, 1905, in the First Ward of the city of Osage, when his place of residence was in the Third Ward. Section 1090 of the Code declares that “no person shall vote in any precinct but that of his residence,” and section 642, relating to municipal elections, that “ each qualified elector may vote thereat who is a resident of the city or town and, at the time, has been ten days a resident of the precinct in which he offers to vote.” The penalty denounced for the violation of these statutes is found in section 4921, enacting…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Spurr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Wass v. . StephensNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Behrensmeyer v. KreitzIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Chase v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1862
  5. State v. PrestonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. United States v. MurdockSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Bryan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Brown v. BullockCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  4. Townsend v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  5. First Commodity Corp. Of Boston and Richard Badoian v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, and John RuddyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API