Legal Opinion

State v. Lester

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 24, 1978No. 76PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COPELAND, Justice.

Defendant brings forward seven assignments of errpr. For reasons hereinafter discussed, we find each of these assignments to be without merit; therefore, defendant’s conviction must be affirmed.

Defendant first contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a probable cause hearing in District Court, which was made one month after return of the bill of indictment. It is well-settled in this state that, at common law, a defendant could be tried on a bill of indictment without the necessity of a probable cause hearing. State v. Vick, 287 N.C. 37, 213 S.E. 2d 335,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Johnson v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. State v. FoustSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. State v. GoldbergSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. Atkinson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. State v. HennisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  2. State v. OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. State v. EasterlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  5. State v. EasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API