Legal Opinion

United States v. Richmond

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Decided November 18, 1944No. 4898PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, District Judge.

Everett Henry Richmond was convicted on two counts of an indictment, one of which charged him with working at an unregistered still, and the other with making, possessing, and fermenting mash fit for distillation. Motion was made to set aside the verdict and grant a new trial. Because of the importance of the questions involved it seems proper to discuss them at some length; hence this opinion.

The Government’s case rested principally on the testimony of Lester Groves, an agent of the Federal Alcohol Tax Unit. Groves testified that while observing a moonshine still, to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Gouled v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. United States v. LefkowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. PlantzWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Bennie Joe Hayden v. Warden, Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
  3. United States v. BelcherDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1983
  4. Bennie Joe Hayden v. Warden, Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
  5. State v. ChinnOregon Supreme Court · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API