State v. Chinn
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
231 Or. 259 (1962)
373 P.2d 392
STATE OF OREGON
v.
CHINN
Supreme Court of Oregon.
Argued March 8, 1962.
Affirmed June 27, 1962.
James M. Hafey, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. On the brief was Vincent Ierulli, Portland.
Charles R. Harvey, Deputy District Attorney, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Charles E. Raymond, District Attorney, Portland.
Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, WARNER, PERRY, SLOAN, O'CONNELL and GOODWIN, Justices.
AFFIRMED.
GOODWIN, J.
This is an appeal from a conviction under ORS 163.210 (1) (statutory rape). The question is…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.