Legal Opinion

State v. Chinn

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1962Published

1Opinion of the Court

231 Or. 259 (1962)

373 P.2d 392

STATE OF OREGON

v.

CHINN

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Argued March 8, 1962.

Affirmed June 27, 1962.

James M. Hafey, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. On the brief was Vincent Ierulli, Portland.

Charles R. Harvey, Deputy District Attorney, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Charles E. Raymond, District Attorney, Portland.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, WARNER, PERRY, SLOAN, O'CONNELL and GOODWIN, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

GOODWIN, J.

This is an appeal from a conviction under ORS 163.210 (1) (statutory rape). The question is…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API