Legal Opinion

Reckitt Benckiser, Inc. v. Jackson

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 28, 2011No. Civil Action 09-445 (ESH)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, District Judge.

Following a remand from the Court of Appeals, see Reckitt Benckiser, Inc. v. EPA, 613 F.3d 1131, 1133 (D.C.Cir.2010), the parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment on the following issue of statutory interpretation: whether the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) has authority under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (“FIFRA”), 7 U.S.C. §§ 136-136y, to bring a misbranding action in lieu of a cancellation proceeding against plaintiff Reckitt Benekiser’s registered rodenticide products based…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Ciba-Geigy Corporation v. U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
  5. Catawba County v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Barrera v. MonsantoSuperior Court of Delaware · 2016
  2. Center for Biological Diversity v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024
  3. Woodstream Corporation v. JacksonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API