Legal Opinion

Center for Biological Diversity v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided February 6, 2024No. 4:20-cv-00555Unknown

1Opinion

Case 4:20-cv-00555-DCB Document 256 Filed 02/06/24 Page 1 of 47 1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Center for Biological Diversity, et al., No. CV-20-00555-TUC-DCB 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER 11 v. 12 United States Environmental Protection Agency, et al., 13 Defendants, 14 and 15 16 Bayer Cropscience LP, et al., 17 Intervenor-Defendants. 18 The Court finds the EPA violated FIFRA notice and comment mandates for issuing 19 “new use” pesticide registrations for OTT dicamba for DT crops (cotton and soybean). For 20 the reasons explained below, the Court…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API