Legal Opinion

Langan v. Langan

California Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1890No. 13620PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.

The record in this case shows that an action for divorce between the parties herein is pending and undetermined in the superior court; that the court made an order that defendant pay to plaintiff $25 per month alimony, and that afterward the court made another order that defendant pay to plaintiff $150 counsel fees. Defendant takes a separate appeal from each of said orders, and respondent moves to dismiss the appeal from the order allowing the counsel fees. (As appellant does not move to dismiss the appeal from the order allowing alimony, that question is not before us.)

The appeal from the…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Southern California Railway Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Sellick v. De CarlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Fairbanks v. LampkinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Harron v. HarronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Aronson v. LevisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API